As designs become more complex, engineers need to evolve how they approach projects.
In the past, teams relied on traditional systems engineering (TSE) methods. This document-centric approach uses specifications and diagrams to manage complex system lifecycles. However, this approach is no longer effective due to the volume of data used today, the speed of development, and the increasing complexity.
Instead, engineers are shifting to model-based systems engineering (MBSE), which uses an interconnected digital model to exchange information. With MBSE, a central repository holds all requirements and creates a single source of truth, ensuring that all documentation remains in sync. Manufacturers in the automotive, aerospace, defense, and other industries are embracing MBSE for product development and refreshing product features in a streamlined manner.
In this article, we examine the key differences between these two engineering strategies and the pros and cons of each.
Engineers have been using a TSE approach for years, so it is a familiar and trusted process. However, significant challenges must be overcome. Sticking with TSE results in more manual, time-consuming work that can delay the time to market.
Pros
Cons
MBSE leverages modern technology to do much of the heavy lifting and avoid data silos that are trapped in a series of documents that may or may not be up to date. With MBSE, documentation and data are always in sync in real time.
Pros
Cons
One of the biggest challenges of shifting to an MBSE model is this cultural shift. Engineers have to adapt to new ways of project design and development, and organizations may need to invest in change management strategies to make an effective transition.
Going beyond the pros and cons, let’s break down the key differences between TSE and MBSE.
Approach to System Representation
Information Management
Traceability
Collaboration
Adaptability to Changes
Consistency
Reusability
Validation and Verification
Stakeholder Communication
Cost and Time Efficiency
Tool Integration
Requirements Management
Simulation and Analysis
The goal of changing from TSE to MBSE is to move from document-centric to data-centric, leveraging a connected information model throughout the product lifecycle. When done effectively, there are significant benefits.
Mitigating Risks
MBSE produces an open representation of relationships and dependencies within a system. This is especially helpful when working in an architecture with integrated components. With a central repository and a single source of truth, you can avoid breaking relationships. You also get an earlier identification of design flaws, enabling you to develop solutions sooner.
Since everyone is working from the same data, the quality and accuracy of the data are improved, reducing the risk of errors or inconsistencies.
Time Savings
Automated document generation and error detection significantly decrease time to market. Rapid iteration and simulations can leverage automation to further accelerate that speed. Fast, integrated learning cycles coupled with design thinking and user-centered design can ensure product viability and usability in less time.
Cost Reductions
Time savings translate to cost reductions in several ways. With a more streamlined data flow, you can improve resource allocation while increasing collaboration. Reducing defects before production avoids unnecessary rework and redesign.
In the long term, products require less maintenance. Since MBSE streamlines production across the product lifecycle, updates and refreshes are also easier, reducing costs for continuous integration and deployment in DevOps.
People often default to the familiar. Without a leadership commitment from the top of an organization, a transition to an MBSE engineering approach may not be effective. Leaders need to:
While explaining the vision seems simple, there is often a misunderstanding of what MBSE is about and its goals. In one study, only 22% of those involved in the systems engineering process could cite a clear definition, potentially leading to a lack of adoption and buy-in.
Making the switch to MBSE requires expertise. You need an experienced engineering, technical, software, and cybersecurity partner to help guide you through the process.
The Sumaria team believes that rapid defense development relies on innovative MBSE solutions. By integrating advanced analytics AI, MBSE helps facilitate systems development from concept to operation, assisting decision-makers in making sound future investments and ensuring national safety.
Sumaria Systems is a reliable and trusted industry partner that uses a series of services, including advisory, assistance, and advanced analytics AI, to convert documents into integrated and interconnected digital models. With over forty years of experience, numerous ISO and CMMI Level 3 certifications, and a clean compliance record with UTD registrations in SAM.gov, Sumaria is a trusted option for government contract awards, with no history of suspension or debarment. Contact Sumaria during your next program to get support for the nation's vital missions with the highest degree of responsiveness, effectiveness, and efficiency.