Government agencies and contractors depend on the integrity of their data to make timely, accurate decisions in high-stakes environments. As cyber threats evolve, so must the infrastructure and network security protocols. A single data breach or integrity failure can compromise national security, undermine operations, or result in mission failure.
Upgrading network security protocols is critical.
When you’re making decisions based on data, you should be able to trust that it’s accurate at every stage of its lifecycle. If the data is compromised, inaccurate, or outdated, you won’t have the confidence to move forward.
Federal frameworks like the NIST SP 800-53, the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA), and the Federal Data Strategy all emphasize the need for data integrity. These policies recognize that government data supports everything from real-time threat detection to strategic planning and logistics.
Even so, challenges remain. Many federal agencies have experienced significant cybersecurity incidents involving potential data compromise. Trust in data—both its security and accuracy—is under continuous threat.
Some systems are a couple of decades old, while others have been in use for over forty years. Legacy systems can introduce packet loss, latency, and unscheduled downtime, each of which can distort or delay mission-critical information.
The need for modernization across government entities grows daily. Deploying advanced wired and wireless systems, such as 10G+ fiber switches and Wi-Fi 6E networks, ensures the speed and reliability required for secure operations. A modernized network architecture boosts data transmission fidelity and supports edge computing, enabling field teams to process and act on data closer to its source.
Regardless of where and how data is stored, accessed, processed, and shared, it must be protected. Federal agencies are mandated to use FIPS 140-3 validated encryption to protect sensitive data in transit and at rest. Even if it’s intercepted, it remains unusable to unauthorized actors.
As agencies migrate to the cloud, the complexity of ensuring compliance with FedRAMP standards increases. Vulnerabilities can emerge in hybrid environments, especially when systems are not properly patched or updated. FedRAMP's Rev 5 guidance addresses this, but full implementation is an ongoing challenge.
To accelerate the implementation, FedRAMP 20X was unveiled as the sole active path to authorization, with more than 80% of requirements now having automated validation. This move away from manual, costly compliance is aimed at increasing compliance. “The reality is that FedRAMP is so expensive and burdensome right now that most companies never consider it,” said FedRAMP director Pete Waterman.
Without proper segmentation, a single breach can enable adversaries to move laterally across systems, accessing sensitive or mission-critical data undetected. Segmented architecture limits the attack surface and enforces need-to-know access, thereby strengthening data custody and control.
The Zero Trust Model
Grounded in NIST 800-207, zero trust requires agencies to “never trust, always verify.” This model mandates continuous verification of users, devices, and network activity based on risk level and context.
The key components of zero trust are:
Although zero trust became a federal mandate in 2022, implementation is still incomplete. For example, the DISA Thunderdome program only recently became the second DoD program to achieve full compliance. The first was the Navy’s cloud-based Microsoft 365 transition, known as Flank Speed.
Progress is underway, but the DoD doesn’t expect to achieve target levels for zero trust deployment across the agency until 2027.
Whether due to natural disasters or cyberattacks, system failures can compromise access to essential information. To mitigate this, agencies must implement strategies outlined in the National Continuity Policy Implementation Plan and FEMA’s Continuity of Operations Planning.
Robust redundancy strategies include cloud failover, load balancing, and distributed backups across secure environments to ensure high availability. A practical example is a situation where field teams need to access synchronized and replicated databases housed in geographically dispersed DoD-secure cloud data centers.
Particularly in defense, military, and secure operations, maintaining situational awareness, making informed decisions, and executing coordinated actions rely on high availability and optimized performance.
Manual monitoring alone can’t keep pace with the speed and complexity of today’s advanced persistent threats. AI and machine learning models can detect anomalies in real time, flag unauthorized changes, and automate responses to contain threats rapidly. By incorporating AI into security operations, agencies can proactively maintain data integrity, rather than reactively respond to breaches.
This has become increasingly important as threat actors and nation states leverage AI tools to increase the volume and velocity of attacks. “As technology continues to evolve, so do cybercriminals' tactics. Attackers are leveraging AI to craft highly convincing voice or video messages and emails,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge Robert Tripp. Furthermore, AI empowers hackers to scale data poisoning, ransomware, and wiper malware attacks targeting government agencies, co-contract partners, and contractors at staggering rates.
Government entities require modern tools to combat these attacks, and that means the deployment of AI-enhanced security solutions.
Even without direct attacks, data can become corrupted or altered over time. Monitoring tools that compare checksums, validate digital signatures, and generate tamper-evident logs help ensure that unauthorized changes are detected early.
These tools must support compliance with auditing directives like OMB A-130 and FedRAMP by providing full traceability of every access or change made to sensitive data systems.
Despite robust technical defenses, human error and insider threats remain top contributors to data integrity breaches. According to the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Agency, threats range from unintentional mistakes to malicious acts intended to abuse authorized access and escalate privileges.
Compliance must extend beyond technical solutions to include training on cybersecurity awareness, emerging threats, and the secure handling of sensitive data. In short, maintaining data integrity means investing in human defenses.
Organizations should have clear policies on secure data handling, along with regular cybersecurity training, simulations, and testing campaigns to minimize risk.
In the digital battlefield of modern government operations, data is more than information: It can be an asset, a weapon, and a vulnerability. Every strategy should support the core objective of ensuring that data remains secure, reliable, and readily available. Agencies and their partners must evolve infrastructure and policies to ensure that their data can be trusted. The ones that protect their data protect their missions and ultimately, national security.
Future-ready networks. Mission-ready operations. Modernizing your base network infrastructure is critical for increasing mission readiness, scalability, and security. Sumaria Systems provides the expertise and innovative solutions to integrate, protect, and optimize your network for peak performance. Discover how Sumaria can help you build a resilient, future-ready infrastructure.