Sumaria Blog

7 Steps to DFARS Compliance to Ensure a Competitive Acquisition

Written by Sumaria | Sep 18, 2024 1:46:22 PM

To ensure the integrity of the acquisition process, foster competition, and ultimately secure the greatest value for the government, contracting officers should follow a seven-step strategy. Each step in this process is designed to safeguard the acquisition from risks and ensure full compliance with the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS).

By adhering to these seven steps and the accompanying checklist of questions at each stage, contracting officers can confidently manage government acquisitions, avoid potential risks, and maintain compliance with the DFARS. This approach strengthens the competitive environment, protects the government's interests, and promotes a fair and transparent procurement process.

1. Am I Promoting Competition as Required? (DFARS 215.371)

Checklist Questions:

  • Have I reviewed DFARS 215.371 to confirm that my acquisition strategy promotes competition?
  • Have I identified any unnecessary restrictions that could limit competition?
  • Did my market research identify multiple potential sources for fulfilling the requirement?
  • Is my solicitation structured to encourage the maximum number of competitors?

Promoting competition is fundamental to achieving the best value for the government. It ensures that the acquisition process is fair and that the government benefits from diverse potential solutions. Failing to promote competition can lead to limited participation, higher costs, and potentially less innovative solutions. This can result in protests or challenges, delaying the procurement process and increasing costs.

To mitigate this risk, regularly review your acquisition strategy against DFARS requirements. Conduct thorough market research to ensure that you are not inadvertently restricting competition.

2. Are My Evaluation Criteria Clear and Aligned with Acquisition Objectives? (DFARS 215.304)

Checklist Questions:

  • Have I clearly defined evaluation criteria that align with the goals of this acquisition?
  • Are the standards for evaluation objective, measurable, and transparent?
  • Do the criteria encourage innovation, value, and fair competition?
  • Could any of the criteria be perceived as overly restrictive or limiting competition?

Clear, well-defined evaluation criteria are essential for a transparent and fair acquisition process. They ensure that all bidders understand how their proposals will be assessed, which fosters trust and encourages participation. Ambiguous or overly restrictive criteria can lead to confusion among bidders, reduced competition, and challenges to the award decision. This can cause delays and potentially result in less optimal contract awards. Regularly review and update evaluation criteria so you can verify that they are clear and aligned with acquisition objectives. Engage with the industry to test and refine criteria, ensuring that they are fair and competitive.

3. Have I Considered Small Business Set-Asides Appropriately? (DFARS 219.502-2)

Checklist Questions:

  • Have I identified opportunities for small business participation in this acquisition?
  • Is this acquisition eligible for a small business set-aside, including those for specific socio-economic groups?
  • Have I clearly documented my rationale for applying or not applying a set-aside?
  • Am I ensuring compliance with small business set-aside requirements throughout the acquisition process?

Incorporating small business set-asides is a statutory requirement and a strategic way to broaden the competitive landscape. It supports small businesses, promotes innovation, and can lead to cost-effective solutions.

Neglecting small business set-asides can reduce competition and result in missed opportunities for innovation. It may also lead to non-compliance with federal requirements, risking legal challenges and delays. Proactively identify and document opportunities for small business participation. Regularly review DFARS 219.502-2 to ensure compliance and engage with small businesses early in the process to assess their capabilities.

4. Is There a Proper Justification for a Sole Source Acquisition? (DFARS 206.302)

Checklist Questions:

  • Have I reviewed the justification and approval requirements for sole-source acquisitions?
  • Have I provided a detailed rationale explaining why competition is impracticable or unfeasible?
  • Is my sole-source justification thoroughly documented and approved by the appropriate authority?
  • Have I conducted market research to confirm that no other sources can meet the requirement?

Sole-source acquisitions are exceptions to the competitive process and must be justified with compelling reasons. Proper justification protects the acquisition from legal challenges and ensures that the government’s interests are safeguarded. Without proper justification, a sole-source acquisition can be challenged, leading to delays, increased scrutiny, and potential non-compliance with federal regulations. This can erode trust and lead to reputational damage. Always conduct thorough market research and document the rationale for a sole-source acquisition. Verify that the justification is reviewed and approved by the appropriate authorities before proceeding.

5. Can I Apply Streamlined Acquisition Procedures? (DFARS 213.5)

Checklist Questions:

  • Does this acquisition qualify for simplified acquisition procedures under DFARS 213.5?
  • Have I ensured that the streamlined process still maintains adequate competition?
  • Am I balancing the need for speed with the requirements for fairness and transparency?
  • Are my decisions to use streamlined procedures well-documented?

Streamlined acquisition processes can reduce the time and resources required for procurement, enabling the quicker delivery of goods and services. However, it’s crucial to ensure that these procedures do not compromise competition or transparency. Failing to apply streamlined procedures where appropriate can lead to unnecessary delays and increased administrative burdens. Conversely, applying them without ensuring adequate competition can result in suboptimal contract awards.

Carefully assess whether streamlined procedures are appropriate for each acquisition. Document all decisions, and ensure that competition is maintained even in a simplified process.

6. Is My Market Research Thorough and Informative? (DFARS 210.001)

Checklist Questions:

  • Have I conducted comprehensive market research to identify potential sources?
  • Is my market research report up to date, and does it inform my acquisition strategy?
  • Did I use feedback from industry days or Requests for Information (RFIs) to gauge market interest and capabilities?
  • Is my market research helping to ensure competition and identify new market entrants?

Market research is the foundation of a competitive acquisition process. It informs every aspect of the acquisition, from defining requirements to identifying potential sources and assessing risks. Insufficient market research can lead to poorly defined requirements, limited competition, and higher costs. It also increases the risk of challenges to the acquisition process, which can cause delays and additional expenses. Conduct market research early and update it regularly. Engage with the industry through RFIs or industry days to gather insights and validate your findings.

7. Is My Acquisition Documentation Accurate and Up to Date? (DFARS 204.270-1)

Checklist Questions:

  • Have my acquisition plans and strategies been updated to reflect the latest DFARS requirements?
  • Does my documentation support the competitive aspects of this acquisition?
  • Have I ensured that all necessary approvals, determinations, and justifications are documented?
  • Have I conducted a post-award review to assess the competition and extract lessons learned?

Accurate and up-to-date documentation is essential for compliance and provides a clear audit trail. It ensures that decisions are transparent and defensible, reducing the risk of protests or challenges. Incomplete or outdated documentation can lead to compliance issues, challenges to the acquisition, and difficulties in defending decisions. It can also hinder post-award reviews and the ability to learn from the process.

Regularly review and update all acquisition documentation. Conduct post-award reviews to assess the effectiveness of the competition and document any lessons learned for future acquisitions.

Conclusion

By asking these critical questions and understanding the importance of each step, contracting officers can ensure that they are fully compliant with the DFARS while promoting a fair and competitive procurement environment. Validating each step in this checklist helps secure the best value for the government and minimizes the risks associated with non-compliance and inadequate competition.

Sumaria Systems, a reliable small business, has been a trusted industry partner to the US government for over forty years. As a CMMI Level 3, ISO 9001, and ISO 27001 certified contractor with current registrations in SAM.gov, Sumaria has a clean record of never being on the debarred or suspended list. Its leadership, composed of former defense and intelligence community leaders, has steered the business to current and past contract performances for which it consistently receives exceptional ratings. Contact Sumaria to help solicit, negotiate, enter into, and manage contracts between the government and potential contractors.